Student elections in Jordan and Oxford

Student elections in Jordan and Oxford

On the surface, student elections in Jordan are very similar to those in the UK; in both countries, candidates print leaflets and banners and canvas for votes. In reality, however, the Jordanian elections are a far cry from those in Oxford. Whilst violence darkens the campuses of Jordanian Universities during student elections, Oxford currently has a joke candidate as its OUSU President. Student politics is heavily debated and can sometimes be controversial in the UK, on occasion leading to protest, but it is difficult to imagine someone being hospitalised or worse because they support a certain candidate. This, however, is not infrequent at Jordanian universities, which see fights and deaths almost every year.

Whilst this year’s student elections for OUSU ran smoothly – with the biggest mishap being a need to recount the votes – the elections at the University in the Jordanian capital, Amman, were postponed from the end of 2014 to March 2015. This was partly due to the violence that had hit educational institutes elsewhere across the kingdom in December during the period of student elections.

This violence stems from tribal rivalries and allegiances which dominate not just student politics but Jordan’s politics as a whole. In a country where giving people two votes – one for their tribal and family allegiances and one for their political preference – was considered (but not passed), it is clear that tribal politics dominates all areas of life.

2013 saw a particularly violent year in Jordanian student politics, with five students dead by June due to the violence. In March 2013, a conflict between two students in a University in the central town of Karak turned into a fight involving Molotov cocktails after armed men from the students’ tribes waded in. The clashes ended with the death of a student and the fight was solved only through a temporary tribal truce. In April of the same year, a fight between two students became an open battle in a university in the south of the country when tribal supporters of students poured onto campus with weapons. Four people, one of whom was a professor, died, and the university closed its doors for a month. Violence is highest in the south of the country and in rural areas; there, tribes are the strongest identity referent for many students. These tribal tensions spill over into student elections, with students and the general public fighting to ensure that the candidate from their tribe wins.

This year, although there was widespread violence in the student elections in the south of the country, it was less serious than in 2013. The Jordanian University elections that had been postponed due to the violence were held relatively peacefully. However, there was a small scuffle after some outsiders tried to enter the university, and there was a constant police presence outside the university throughout the election period.

We would do well to learn from our fellow students in Jordan: student politics can have a big influence on national politics, and many people who hold important positions in Student Unions go on to play prominent roles in society in the future, both in Jordan and in the UK. Whilst we should encourage more engagement in student politics in Oxford and hope that the government and people in power take student politics more seriously in the UK, we must be grateful that our elections can be held peacefully.

PHOTO/ Sahar.Ahmed

Launch of OUSU initiative to subsidise sanitary products

Launch of OUSU initiative to subsidise sanitary products

OUSU has introduced a new initiative to subsidise women’s sanitary products for JCRs.

The pilot scheme, originally announced in March, came into action on 19th April.  During Trinity term, OUSU will provide “pads, tampons, pantyliners and mooncups” to common rooms at or below cost price, while also absorbing the 5% “luxury” tax which is currently imposed on these products.

Anna Bradshaw, OUSU’s Vice-President for Women, said:  “I’m very excited to launch the pilot of this scheme to provide pads, tampons, panty liners and mooncups at or below cost price to common rooms.  This will enable common rooms to cheaply source sustainable sanitary products for their students, hopefully ensuring that all students who menstruate have access to sanitary products that are affordable, and ideally free.  OUSU is absorbing the 5% “luxury” tax placed on these items because we believe that they are a necessity.”

Bradshaw also noted the further initiative in the project whereby common rooms can choose to match their order with a box of sanitary products worth £7.50 which OUSU will provide on their behalf to homelessness services in Oxford.

She continued: “This belief [in the necessity of sanitary products] is also reflected in the ‘Period Match’ function of the scheme, where common rooms can match their order with a box pads, tampons and pantyliners that OUSU will provide to homelessness services in Oxford.  I hope that this pilot will be just the first step towards improving student access to cheaper periods.” 

OUSU already subsidises the provision of condoms and other welfare supplies, as it has done for several years.

The current 5% tax rate on sanitary products in the UK has been challenged recently, with an online petition under the title “Stop Taxing Periods. Period” attracting over 220,000 signatures.

First year student Fiona Donnan commented, saying: “I feel this is a great idea, because I pay a fuck-tonne of money for the pleasure of bleeding every month. However, I’d be interested to know what kind they’re providing, because some brands can be quite uncomfortable which is the last thing you need when you’re menstruating.”

Common rooms can order sanitary products from OUSU from the Friday of 0th week.

PHOTO/ Celia Hippie

Protest has shamed OUSU, not the Union

Protest has shamed OUSU, not the Union

As the visit of Marine le Pen to the Union fades into the relative distance, the ideologies of the no-platformers, claiming to act on our behalf through OUSU, must continue to be challenged. It is outdated, indefensible and hypocritical- even more so due to the fact it is espoused in all our names.

The ineffectiveness of no-platform policies at stopping ideologies they dislike should be fairly clear. They did nothing to stop the rise of the BNP in the 2010 European elections. For all that is made of the 3,000 membership requests that followed Nick Griffin’s appearance on Question Time, much more should be made of how many people surely watched the show and realised that the BNP was not a legitimate party of protest. Louis Brandeis was right to call sunlight the best disinfectant; it is only through exposing fascism for what it is – for giving it a platform from which to drown in its own poison – that we destroy this narrative with a healthy dose of truth.


1 2 3 13