Within the build-up to the 2014 Tour de France, the most prominent news story – at least in British terms – was Team Sky’s omission of Bradley Wiggins from their nine-strong squad in favour of Chris Froome. Such a choice by Sky’s General Manager Dave Brailsford was glamorised further by the purportedly ongoing “feud” between Wiggins and Froome whose origins lie in the 2012 Tour in which Froome’s loyalty to Wiggin’s eventually successful attempt at winning the yellow jersey was called into question: during the ascent of La Toussuire, Froome, at this point 3rd in the general classification, left behind Wiggins and the rest of the peloton, only to be called back on the team radio.
Since these ignominious beginnings, the highlights reel of their apparent mutual hostility has included Wiggins withholding bonus payments from Froome for the 2012 Tour de France victory, a twitter spat between Froome’s fiancée and Wiggin’s camp over the leadership of the 2013 tour, and most recently (and I should note in answer to an extremely leading question) Froome telling BBC Radio 5 Live that he sensed mental weakness in Wiggins during the 2012 Tour. All this being coupled with the fact that this year’s tour commenced in Britain for the first time since 1974, and moreover with the fact that British riders have won the tour two years on the trot, and it became clear that many British eyes would be on Froome, to see if he could live up to the billing once more.
But alas, as another addition to Britain’s miserable summer of sport (which of course includes Cavendish’s retirement through injury early in the tour), Froome made it to France and then in Stage 4 and 5 fell off his bike several times, the final time fracturing his wrist and hand, and forcing his retirement from this year’s tour. With the wonder of hindsight, questions must be and have been asked, primarily what Wiggins could have offered as a second rider in such an eventuality. Whilst favouring Froome over Wiggins – who is older, has less recent success, and was arguably no less dominant in his tour victory than Froome was in his own – is clearly rational, the decision to omit Wiggins altogether seems to have left Team Sky with no insurance option in terms of an attempt to win the yellow jersey, or at least thus goes the opinion of three-time tour winner Greg LeMond:
“There’s [sic] a lot of risks in this sport, it’s a big budget sport. I think Sky’s got a €20million budget, around $30million, and you’ve got to have insurance on this thing”
Nevertheless, in this land of hope and glory, though certainly a rank outsider compared to the likes of Vincenzo Nibali and Alberto Contador, and though not so much a member of Britain as a member of the Commonwealth, the Australian Richie Porte offers Team Sky a second chance at winning a third consecutive yellow jersey. The decision to have the 29 year old Porte now leading Team Sky is in no way ill-considered; he was Froome’s second rider in the 2013 Tour de France, and was set to be Sky’s leader at the 2014 Giro d’Italia before illness forced him to withdraw. Indeed with the tour soon to take to the mountains, Porte, an expert climber, should be in his element. Without the expectation and the baggage of in-team rivalry which belonged to Froome, Porte, often in the background of Team Sky but seldom absent, has a chance – if not to win – to cement his stake as a soon to be first-choice team leader. With Nibali, the present wearer of the yellow jersey, riding consistently well with the help of his team mate Jakob Fuglsang (currently in second place), and with Contador four minutes behind the race leader, but seemingly biding his time for the more mountainous stages, Porte will have his work cut out to regain the yellow jersey for Team Sky; nonetheless, along with his British team mate Geraint Thomas (another potential future tour winner), Porte looks set to deliver at least some degree of success to Team Sky in this year’s Tour de France.
Apparently it was all part of the plan. Sitting smugly in front of an adoring press, Louis Van Gaal recounted how the apparent masterstroke of substituting first choice goalkeeper with supposed penalty expert Tim Krul as extra time in their World Cup quarter final against Costa Rica drew to a close was a premeditated move. ‘We thought it through’ he said. ‘Every player has certain skills and qualities and they don’t always coincide. We felt that Tim would be the most appropriate keeper to save penalties’.
However despite the fact that Krul has the longer reach of the two goalkeepers, and despite his borderline unacceptable tactics of intimidation which almost certainly contributed to the two Costa Rican penalty misses that contributed to their shootout defeat, there is absolutely nothing in his previous penalty saving record for either Newcastle or the Netherlands that suggests he is a penalty expert. Van Gaal obviously knew this, despite his comments, which leaves only the explanation that the last minute keeper switcheroo was an elaborate bluff. The Costa Ricans could not possibly have known about Krul’s penalty record, which would mean that the only possible explanation for the switch was that he was, in fact, a penalty specialist, a move which sufficiently unnerved the Costa Rican penalty takers, flawless in their 5-4 shootout win against Greece in the last 16, to lead to the two misses which led to their defeat. Krul’s antics, his devious leftward and rightward steps that lured his opponents to put their penalties exactly where he wanted them, were the actions of a man galvanised by his manager’s complete faith in him. This substitution was not simply, as Van Gaal would have us believe, the substitution of one skillset with another. It was a psychological ploy, a bluff that became a truth and that is what took it from being an innovative and radical tactical manoeuvre to a true masterstroke and, perhaps, the greatest substitution the World Cup has ever seen.
However, in the rush to applaud Van Gaal’s tactical genius and to recast previous astute manoeuvres such as that to bring on Huntelaar for Van Persie whilst his team were trailing against Mexico in the last 16 as flashes of inspiration of a similar calibre a key fact has been forgotten. Louis Van Gaal is, at this World Cup, a man with nothing to lose. During the Netherland’s impressive rush to the semi-finals it has been easy to forget that the team arrived in Brazil under almost no expectation. With a squad made up of ageing stars and largely unknown players from the Dutch league, and having been placed in a group with double European and World champions Spain, as well as a highly impressive Chile side there was little expectation on the Oranje, with many pundits expecting them to fail to get out of the group. Add this on to the fact that Louis Van Gaal has a job at Manchester United once this tournament is over and you have a man capable of making the kinds of decisions that he has. It would be easy to imagine the media bloodbath that would ensue if, like Van Gaal, Roy Hodgson had announced that he was changing his tactics just 2 weeks before the start of the finals and one can only imagine what the lengths the more sensational parts of the British press would go to if he had tried a similar goalkeeper switch and it had not come off. Van Gaal has no such worries.
In spite of the Netherlands impressive overachievement in reaching the semi finals the question must be asked; how far has Van Gaal’s tactical innovation actually contributed to them getting this far? It was clear from the emphatic 5-1 win against Spain that the counter attacking 5-3-2 system he chose to employ can be brutally effective against opponents who are looking to take the game from the Dutch but subsequent dubious performances against Australia and Mexico, and their failure to break Costa Rica down calls into question its effectiveness against defensive sides. Even where it is effective it is not exactly original. Martin O’Neil, a bright ray of intelligence amongst the rest of ITV’s gormless punditry team, pointed out in his analysis of their victory against Mexico that Van Gaal was employing a system almost identical to one he himself had used at Leicester in the 90s and which Brian Clough had conceived whilst leading Nottingham Forest to 2 European Cups in the early 1980s. Indeed the Netherlands’ detractors have pointed to the fact that, at least during normal time, their key strategy has seemed to be to just give it to Robben in the hope that he might make something happen in a way reminiscent of Argentina and Messi at this world cup, something which their coach Alejandro Sabella has taken criticism for.
What Van Gaal has had that Sabella has lacked have been these last minute fudges, the Huntelaars and Kruls, with which he has been able to pull his team out of the mire. This is something that is sure to have pleased every Manchester United fan watching this World Cup. Whilst Sir Alex Ferguson was never one for elaborate tactical experimentation, often sticking the with tried and true 4-4-2 and 4-5-1 formations what made him the most successful manager the game has ever seen was his unparalleled ability to read and change a game. Fans of clubs other than Manchester Untied talk about ‘Fergie time’ as a kind of unfair ‘get out of jail free’ card employed by intimidated referees to get United off the hook. Whilst it is true that United, and indeed all big clubs, do tend to get the rub of the green whilst losing at home in terms of added time, it was Ferguson’s superb late game tactical management that meant his teams took advantage more than most. Van Gaal’s ability to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat at this World Cup has seemed Ferguson-esque in its execution.
What will perhaps be most encouraging however is the similarity in the situation of the Netherlands team whom he has taken far further than expected and the Manchester United squad he will inherit after the tournament. Both are ageing sides with a couple of genuinely world class players capable at times of carrying their teams unaided and a supporting cast of various and sometimes dubious quality. But where Van Gaal has perhaps excelled the most this World Cup is in man management, blending the likes of Aston Villa’s Ron Vlaar and the limited Bruno Martins Indi into a functioning and effective defence and giving the likes of the untested Daley Blind and the ageing and one dimensional Dirk Kuyt the confidence and platform to perform beyond themselves. Whilst it would be astounding to see the Netherlands win the World Cup after Germany’s evisceration of Brazil and last night and perhaps even a shock to see them progress from tonight’s semi final against Argentina the fact that they have got this far should be a great source of pride to Van Gaal and the Dutch nation. Whilst those claiming that this World Cup has proved that Van Gaal is an unparalleled tactician are conveniently glossing over the many things him and his team have done wrong this World Cup there is no doubt that Manchester United have secured themselves a manager who, in terms of tactical and man management ability, has all the hallmarks of a worthy replacement to the great Sir Alex Ferguson.
With Wimbledon in full swing, it is definitely worth taking a moment to remember all the fashion tips we have learnt over the years from the sport of kings, on and off the court…
- Always match your hat to your shoes. In fact, entire outfit coordination is a real winner in the style stakes.
- The hardest working item in your wardrobe is a pleated skirt. A timeless piece, it conjures up images of frolicking in the summer sun (hopefully with a glass of Pimm’s in hand).
- White is a perennial summer staple. This does not apply to one’s arms – St. Tropez is a must (the seaside resort or the self-tan, whichever is the more realistic alternative).
- Invest in substantial raingear. When it starts to pour, it simply will not do to be without cover. If you can’t afford an £80m retractable roof, a purple and green umbrella will suffice.
- The only accessory to be seen with is undoubtedly a significant other with perfectly coiffed hair. Or a trophy.
- The best way to ace casual wear is with a pristine pair of Stan Smiths. Unless, of course, you choose to indulge in a bit of sneaker art. Note: festival-style mud does not count.
- At this time of year, it is important to show one’s patriotism through the support of homegrown brands (Reiss, Mulberry, Tesco Finest Strawberries).
- Never wear coloured underwear under white clothing. What many a fashionista has long known to be true is now an official RULE. So for the love of lycra, do follow.
- Always, always, always invest in a good stain remover.
To paraphrase Bertolt Brecht, blessed is the country that is not in need of heroes. Costa Rica is such a country. Without an army since 1948, this small Central American nation is an oasis of calm and a haven of transparent democracy and rule of law in a violent and tumultuous region. Where other nations’ national anthems speak of war, conquest, kings and queens, Costa Rica’s exalts ‘the simple farm hands’ and hails their nation as ‘gentle homeland! Mother of love!’. With unparalleled natural beauty, impressive human development and socioeconomic indicators which leave it as by far the happiest country in the world according to the Happy Planet Index, Costa Rica seems to be perhaps the luckiest nation on earth. So maybe the heroic performance of the Costa Rican team at this World Cup is simply the cherry on the cake. A taste of glory on the world stage for this tiny nation, a smattering of heroes richly deserved, if barely needed.
There was no expectation on the team going into this tournament. Drawn in a group with three former world champions in England, Italy and Uruguay, Costa Rica were barely expected to make a ripple. Ranked 28th in the world and given odds of 2000/1 to win the tournament and a huge 15/1 to merely escape their group they were framed by the media less as whipping boys than as a piñata to be smashed by the powerhouses they were competing against. These predictions could not have been further from the truth. Costa Rica put in inspired performances to deservedly beat both Uruguay and put in a controlled performance to effortlessly hold off England in a 0-0 draw to advance to the last 16 as group winners. However it was last night’s performance against Greece that was perhaps the most impressive. A disciplined performance off the ball, with the team’s high pressing and defensive line restricting the traditionally dour and deep Greeks to sporadic attacks and crafting chances from set pieces, laid the foundations for the Ticos to take the lead with an excellent finish from captain Bryan Ruiz. However it was after Oscar Duarte was sent off in the 65th minute that they truly showed their mettle. Despite succumbing to a cruel equaliser in the 90th minute they continued, cramp ridden and outnumbered, to put up a Spartan-esque resistance against the resurgent Greeks. Forcing the game to penalties was victory in itself and having earned the opportunity to save the game they took it with aplomb, taking five penalties, scoring all of them with the Greeks being thwarted by an astonishing save from goalkeeper Keylor Navas, flying to his right to palm away a perfectly struck penalty from Gekas to earn a famous victory and a first ever World Cup quarter final for his nation. Drenched in sweat after the game and on the verge of tears, Navas told reporters that what he and his teammates had achieved “was only a dream for us, a dream that became a reality, a dream that was dreamt by an entire country”.
As the cliché goes, hindsight is a wonderful thing, but unlike the impressive form of the Dutch, explained by Van Gaal’s tactic nous and the exemplary performance of the Chileans, desperately unlucky not to knock out Brazil, it appears that no one has attempted to offer any explanations as to the form of the hugely overachieving Costa Ricans. The truth is that, on paper, there is very little to suggest that they are anywhere near capable of achieving what they have. In Keylor Navas of Levante and soon, perhaps, of Athletico Madrid, they have a genuinely world class goalkeeper. Other than him the promising Joel Campbell of Arsenal, PSV’s intelligent and elegant Bryan Ruiz and the tireless Christian Bolaños, plying his trade with F.C Copenhagen have excelled themselves at this tournament but can hardly be described as the kind of players you would expect to drag a team to the last 8 of the World Cup. Their manager Jorge Luís Pinto is widely renowned in his native Colombia and throughout South America as an innovative and inventive tactician but with the highlights of his trophy cabinet being a Costa Rican title with Alajuelense in 2003 and a Colombian title with Cucuta Deportivo in 2006 he can hardly be described as having the kind of pedigree you’d expect from a top level international manager, which is what he has proved himself to be. Neither is it the advantages of the Brazilian weather with their two victories over Greece and Italy coming in Recife, where the comfortable humidity and temperatures in the mid 20s are far more reminiscent of the Mediterranean than the tropical climes of Costa Rica.
So what then can we owe Costa Rica’s fine form to? Certainly the high intensity pressing game and astounding fitness of the players, shown by their ability to resist the Greek onslaught with 10 men throughout extra time, can be considered a factor. So too perhaps can Uruguayan complacency in the first game of the group as well as the lack of Italian and English attacking imagination when faced with this tightly organised Costa Rican team. However what is most evident in this team is a huge amount of team spirit and self-belief, spearheaded by their manager Jorge Luís Pinto. Asked about his side’s prospects against the Netherlands in the quarter-finals, opponents who will certainly not make the mistake of underestimating them, he said that “we will continue fighting. We will go on. We will see beautiful things. Rest assured that we will not get eliminated in the quarter finals”. However this is not a question that will have been asked by any of the tens of thousands of Costa Ricans who flooded the streets of the capital San José following the final whistle. This football mad nation of just 5 million people had no expectation of miracles coming into this tournament and whatever happens against the Netherlands they will return to Costa Rica as heroes. But this is exactly the point. The simple fact that their team have defied all expectations and delivered results beyond anyone’s wildest expectations will be enough. Costa Rica is not a nation that needs heroes, but this World Cup has given a team and a story that they can be justly proud of, and richly deserve.
‘The worst day of captaincy I have seen at international level in almost twenty-five years’ was how Australian spin legend Shane Warne described Alastair Cook’s performance on the fourth day of England’s test match against Sri Lanka last week.
The day played host to a monumental English batting collapse, with the first five wickets being lost for just 57 runs with Cook only contributing 16 of them after being bowled by Dhannika Prasad following a horribly misjudged pull shot. It seems fitting that a man experiencing such a torrid time with the bat should be dismissed following the attempt at a shot that had previously been one of his most prolific.
Predictably, when one of the greatest bowlers of all time comes out with a comment such as that, the cricketing world takes note but Warne’s critique should be put in context as both him and Piers Morgan (another one of Cook’s fiercest critics) are both close friends with former England batsman Kevin Pietersen. Pietersen was obviously recently dismissed from England’s plans by the ECB, with Cook thought to have had a decisive influence on the decision and tensions still exist between the former team-mates.
Nonetheless, it is undeniable that a lot of Warne and Morgan’s condemnations are valid with their criticisms centring largely around Cook’s form with the bat. In his last 24 innings, he has managed to secure just 601 runs at an average of 25 which completely contrasts his overall Test average for England of 45.
Cook looks a shadow of the player he used to be with bat in hand and at international standard cricket, a team simply cannot afford to be carrying members of their batting order (particularly towards the top) which is something England have unfortunately been seen doing on too many occasions with their captain. A lot of his dismissals have simply been too cheap for a man of his quality and his inability to push on for scores above 50 have been painfully apparent in recent matches.
It is probably a fair comment to assert that Cook hasn’t the been the same batsman since becoming captain, with only two centuries being secured since the start of 2013, but it is his captaincy itself that has come under most scrutiny from his critics.
During England’s catastrophic tour of Australia last winter, Cook was accused of using defensive fields and seeking to build-up pressure on opposition batsman rather than constantly seek wickets. Certainly his performance as captain was in contrast to his opposite number Michael Clarke who effectively employed the talents of bowlers like Mitchell Johnson and Nathan Lyon to wreak havoc in the English batting order.
I personally have also held serious doubts over the timing of many of Cook’s declarations which have recurrently appeared too conservative, meaning England had posted an unreachable score but without enough time to ensure the opposition’s ten wickets were taken. He was guilty of this again in the second test match with Sri Lanka when he allowed Gary Balance to secure his maiden test century instead of throwing down the gauntlet in the afternoon session and giving England’s bowlers well over four sessions to secure a win going into the final test. A laudable act, but there is little room for niceties in test cricket, as the fact that the final two test matches of the series came to down to the last few overs demonstrates.
As a man, I have no doubt that Cook is the right man for the job however. He is well-spoken, calm and logical whilst also possessing the capability of making hard decisions, as shown by his encouragement of isolating Kevin Pietersen from the international scene. He comes across extremely well in media interviews as well and is arguably very much the quintessential English cricket captain; uncontroversial, respectable and solid.
Yet this solidity is shaking and with his batting form at an all-time low, his position is rightly under question before a crucial home series with India, one of the world’s most dangerous cricket teams.
I do think Cook should be given one final chance however and should seek the refuge of his county Essex in order to try and rectify his batting, work on his technique and clear his head before what is bound to be some of the most crucial few months of his careers.
When Cook is in form, as he was in the Ashes series of 2010-11, he is truly one of the greatest English batsman to have ever graced the field. He possesses a mental strength that allows him to retain enough concentration to accumulate monumental scores such as his 294 against India at Edgbaston in 2011 and it is this quality which he needs to use to address his weaknesses, seek improvement as both captain/batsman and lead his country into a new generation of English cricket.
With individuals such as James Anderson, Ian Bell and Stuart Board; he is a leader of a team that possesses genuine world-class quality and with promising youngsters such as Moeen Ali, Gary Balance and Joe Root all showing promise in the Sri Lanka test series, I am honestly of the belief that we are on the dawn of another exciting epoch of cricket in England.
I am also equally of the opinion that Cook is the right man to oversee it and believe a resurgence of his batting form will help get the critics of his back and signal genuine improvement in his captaincy as well. Cook must however address his conservative nature and become much more willing to employ attackive tactics to ensure England start winning test matches again. There is nothing wrong with being cautious and safe but this should be balanced with the ability to know when risks should be appropriately taken.
The line between designer and sportswear has become increasingly blurred. Neon trainers and bomber jackets are swamping the Spring/Summer’14 collections and it has become clear that sportswear is no longer just for working out. It has become more elegant and chic, creating a luxe sport trend which many designers have embraced. It’s all about the bright colours and the texture, creating an effortless style. This casually cool look rejects the idea that you need to ‘suffer to look good’ and takes pressure off women who believe it is necessary to dress up in order to be stylish. It all started with the sportspeople, so here’s how to steal the style of those who actually work out and look fashionable at the same time.
In hockey we’re constantly looking at scurrying feet, and field hockey captain Kate Walsh stands out with her neon trainers. You can wear them with skinny jeans or use them to dress down a nice skirt. Not only do neon trainers add colour and impact to your outfit, but they are also practical and comfortable, especially on a busy day. Plus, no blisters! Goodbye heels!
Serena Williams keeps a feminine touch to her outfit whilst playing tennis with this cute blue tennis dress. The bonus of not actually wearing it to play sport means that you can jazz it up by adding big earrings and nice bracelets. It would equally work on holiday since the breathable material keeps you cool and stylish at the same time.
If you’re fretting about your bikini bod, go for a one-piece swimsuit in dark colours like Rebecca Adlington’s. The sombre colours will make you look slimmer and won’t draw attention to your imperfections. One piece suits are especially handy for water-based activities like banana boating as you won’t have to worry about losing part of your swimsuit when you fall in the water. If you want, throw on a print shawl or big hat when you’re not in the water.
The team GB jackets for the London 2012 Olympics were admired and envied by many fashionistas. The bomber jacket can go with anything from crop tops and jeans to summer dresses and is also great teamed with a smile like road race silver medallist Lizzie Armistead. Bonus points if you get one in the colours of the British flag.
Not only is Jessica Ennis Great Britain’s golden girl, but she’s also a great style icon. Take a leaf out of her book by clashing colours. Sports luxe is all about mixing shades of pale pink, orange, blue and beige so don’t be afraid to go bold. If you don’t want to clash item of clothing, use accessories to your advantage by teaming a neon pink satchel with a yellow blouse.
A lot of sportswear is unisex so who says you can’t draw inspiration from sportsmen too? Steal Welsh rugby player Lee Halfpenny’s stripy high-knee socks to wear with heels or boots.
When I say the word ‘sportswear’, what do you think of? Is it a sweaty grey T-shirt, kept a safe distance away from your other clothes and produced only in the event of an aerobics class? Or is it a sleek image of a celebrity off to their early-morning yoga class in Juicy Couture? What we wear for exercise can be merely functional, but it can also make a statement about us, the same way any clothes can. It shows the world what sport we play, what brands we buy, and what team we support. In Oxford, sporting culture is as much a part of our heritage as May-morning and the Bodleian, from the four minute mile to True Blue. But the sport of today looks very different to that of yesteryear. I spoke to Dr Martin Polley, a historian of sport and leisure, about what’s changed in terms of what we wear for sport. He said that “like all aspects of sport, from nutrition and psychology to playing surfaces and media coverage, sports clothing has changed immeasurably over the past century. New materials and technologies have made sportswear far more functional than the clothes being worn in the early twentieth century – it’s more aero- or aquadynamic, it weighs less, it’s more breathable, and, in high-risk sports such as equestrianism, climbing, and motorsports, it is safer. A good way to look at this is to compare the all wool swimsuits being worn by Olympic swimmers into the 1920s with the high-tech skins that imitate shark skins now.” So, next time you’re unhappy about waking up early for a swim trial, count yourself lucky that at least you’re not wearing a heavy, absorbent material.
Of course, the main focus of sportswear tends to be its practicality. Though we may attempt to change things up with statement trainers or – in absolutely desperate times – neon legwarmers, comfort and performance mostly outweigh aesthetic concerns. This, it seems, was not the always the case in the past, especially for women. “The scientific imperative towards improved performance is not the only factor in change,” says Dr Polley. “As attitudes towards the body have changed, so more skin can be displayed – compare the Edwardian women tennis players like Dorothea Lambert Chambers, who had to play in corsets and ankle-length dresses, with the attire of today’s Wimbledon champions. Sport has been seen by historians as one of the agents of change in women’s dress – Victorian and Edwardian cyclists in particular were at the forefront of the movement for what was known as rational dress, and they helped the movement away from corsets and towards bloomers and trousers for women.” Playing tennis in a corset is certainly not my idea of fun. However, things are not always plain-sailing for female competitors: “it’s crucial to remember that while practicality has certainly improved, some sports still retain rules about women’s clothing that place cultural and social norms, and indeed sex appeal, above practicality. Wimbledon’s insistence that women must play in dresses or skirts rather than shorts, as in other Grand Slam tournaments, is an example of the former; while beach volleyball’s rule that female players had to wear bikinis, which was changed as recently as 2012 to be more accommodating for Muslim competitors, was a clear example of the latter.”
Fashion’s idea of sportswear often takes the form of the ‘sports luxe’ trend – usually an excuse to use a lot of lamé and create wedge trainers – but it’s obvious that the sporting world has an influence on designers. One need only look at the sleek, minimalist designs of Stella McCartney and others to see it. Sport, according to Dr Polley, has long had an influence on fashion: “French tennis player Suzanne Lenglen, the biggest star of the 1920s, was imitated for her style, particularly her dresses and the ‘Lenglen bandeau’, both on and off the court, while the Duke of Windsor, both before and after the abdication crisis, helped to popularise the golfing sweater. And it’s important to remember that some popular labels, such as Lacoste and Fred Perry, were started by sportsmen.”
So what is it about sport that attracts the attention of the fashion world? Obviously there are similarities between the two: models and athletes both have to stay in peak physical condition, sports clubs and fashion houses both require significant investment, and people involved with both worlds are lauded by the public. For Dr Polley, the relationship is “in part about style, functionality, and comfort in everyday clothing – after all, many people who wear sportswear on the street never come close to regular exercise. But it’s also about aspiration. Clothing based in sportswear (particularly if it has been endorsed by a famous sporting celebrity) carries signifiers of activity, glamour, and vitality. Now, as designers draw inspiration from sport, and as more sportsmen and sportswomen (and people with associations to sportsmen, such as Victoria Beckham) have their own labels, we will see far more of this crossover.”
Martin Polley is author of Moving the Goalposts, Sports History: A Practical Guide and The British Olympics. He’s on Twitter @HistoryMartin
Oxford’s Radcliffe Chimeras Quidditch team have continued their winning streak after claiming victory in the European Regional Championships in Brussels last week.
The muggle Quidditch tournament, hosted by the International Quidditch Association, attracted 12 teams from countries like France, Italy, Belgium and Spain.
The team secured a 100-30 point victory over last year’s champions, Paris Phénix, in the finals. Player Steffan Danino achieved the required snitch grab to end the match, and secure the Chimeras’ place as champions of Europe.
Ashley Cooper, president of the Oxford University Quidditch Club, described the competition as “amazing”.
He said: “There was such a buzz of excitement, and the sportsmanship from everyone was incredible.”
“The response from the crowd and other teams was brilliant. We were hoisted onto people’s shoulders and cheered and carried around. We even had people demanding photos and autographs with us.”
The Quidlings, Oxford’s second team, reached the quarter finals of the tournament but lost 50-30 to Italian side Lunatica.
Matthew Western, captain of the team, commented: “The European championships were a huge triumph for the Quidlings, and I couldn’t be prouder of them. Once again our opposition underestimated us and paid the price.”
“Some of the defeats that put us out of the running for the World Cup may have been frustrating[...]but we learnt so much, and I’m sure we’ll hit Europe even harder when we return.”
Western, who is also publicity officer for the club, added: “I hope our victory over some seriously challenging opposition shows Oxford that we are sportspeople first and Harry Potter fans second (if at all), and inspires more to join one of the fastest-growing sports in the country”.
Oxford University Quidditch Club is due to apply to Sport England for official recognition.
The club is also set to host the world’s biggest ever mercenary Quidditch Cup in two weeks’ time, described by Cooper as a Quidditich version of fantasy football, with 150 real players from across Europe.